Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mason

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

— This is an application for an order to annul the proceedings taken under a foreclosure decree alleged to have been had in violation of an alleged supersedeas order, and for a rule against those alleged to have violated the alleged supersedeas order.

It appears that a final decree in the foreclosure of a mortgage was rendered and recorded in the Circuit Court for Duval County on December 1st, 1911; that the property was, beginning with December 4th, 1911, advertised for sale; that from December 23rd, 1911, to 5 P. M. January 1st, 1912, the judge was not at his office or his home and his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Kaolin Co. v. VauseSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. Banning v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Mitchell v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API