Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State Board of Elections

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided November 2, 1993No. CV 288-146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

For the third time in less than four years we are urged to modify our remedial order in this voting rights class action. Pending before the court is the joint motion of plaintiffs and defendants to allow interim gubernatorial appointments to certain vacant judicial posts pending a final decision by the court on the parties’ proposed settlement agreement. Intervenors oppose the interim appointments.

For the reasons below, the joint motion is DENIED. In addition, we SEVER the section 5 portion from the section 2 portion of the case. Henceforth all papers and arguments regarding…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. State of Ala.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  2. United States v. LouisianaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1997
  3. United States v. State of La.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API