Legal Opinion

Doe v. Idaho Department of Health & Welfare

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2011No. 37936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

John and Jane Doe petitioned to adopt AH., who is Jane Doe’s grandson. The magistrate dismissed the adoption petition and granted summary judgment to the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, which has legal custody of AH., because the Department refused to consent to the adoption. The Does argue on appeal that the merits of their adoption petition create a genuine issue of material fact and that the magistrate illegally shortened the time available to respond to the Department’s motion for summary judgment.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sprinkler Irrigation Co., Inc. v. JOHN DEERE INS. COMPANY, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Srba Case No. 39576Idaho Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. KEPLER-FLEENOR v. Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. John Doe (In re Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Dept of H&W v. Does IIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Gordon v. U.S. BankIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Gordon v. U.S. BankIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API