Legal Opinion

Tidey v. Kent Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1914No. Calendar No. 25,944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus by Charles H. Tidey against John S. McDonald, one of the circuit judges of the county of Kent, to require respondent to grant relator’s motion to quash a writ of capias.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Relator was arrested upon a 'capias ad respondendum sued out of the circuit court of Kent county in an action there commenced against him by Charles 0. Smedley as plaintiff. He thereupon furnished bail in the sum of $500, that being the amount indorsed upon said writ by the circuit judge, and later moved the court, through his counsel, for an order quashing the writ and dismissing all proceedings in said cause. This motion was denied, and relator seeks by mandamus from this court to compel the circuit court to grant said motion. The case is now before, us on return to an order from this court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. FarwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kenney v. RanneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Belden v. BlackmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Town v. TaborMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Herbstreit v. BeckwithMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State Ex Rel. Eaton v. HirstWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rath Packing Co. v. General Cold Storage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Salvation Army, Inc. v. EllerbushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Hastings v. OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API