Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Ranney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1893PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stftfed in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Ryan Bros., of Detroit, dealers in knit goods, were succeeded by the Peninsular Knitting Works, of which John T. Ryan was vice-president, which, becoming-involved, on April 1, 1891, gave a mortgage upon its stock and property to one Balch to secure two notes, of $30,-101.03 and $15,000, respectively. On April 9 proceedings were begun in chancery to foreclose this mortgage, and defendant was appointed receiver, and ultimately sold the property mortgaged, by order of court.

The plaintiff is a dealer in yarn at Chicago, and had an arrangement with Ryan Bros, to send them yarn subject to their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. FarwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gutsch v. McIlhargeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aroma Wines & Equipment, Inc v. Columbian Distribution Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Charles Magley III v. M&W IncorporatedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. McAfee v. Bankers Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. In Re DawleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API