Legal Opinion
MPower Communications Corp. v. Hurley
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 29, 2005No. 04 C 6909, No 04 C 7402PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
The Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”) entered an order, pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“1996 Act”), Pub.L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified in scattered sections of 47 U.S.C.) and the Federal Communication Commission’s (“FCC”) rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.501-51.515, setting rates for unbundled network elements (“UNEs”) that the Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”), which is the incumbent local exchange carrier (“ILEC”), must make available to competing local exchange carriers (“CLECs”) that enter into interconnection…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Melvin E. Levinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Tana J. Waid v. Merrill Area Public Schools, Dr. Strand Wedul and James BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Kevin C. Carter v. Tennant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Schurz Communications, Incorporated v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MPower Communications Corp. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- TDS METROCOM, LLC v. BridgeDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005