Legal Opinion
State of Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 11, 2006No. 06-1053, 06-1837PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The State of Wisconsin and the Ho-Chunk Nation entered into a compact enabling the Ho-Chunk Nation to conduct certain gaming activities on its lands in exchange for making payments to Wisconsin. After a disagreement arose, Wisconsin sued the Ho-Chunk Nation to compel arbitration and to appoint an arbitrator. The district court exercised jurisdiction and appointed an arbitrator. The Ho-Chunk Nation appealed from that order, arguing that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that Wisconsin’s complaint failed to state a claim under the Federal Arbitration Act.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Howard Greenberg v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., and Bear, Stearns Securities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk NationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Wiese v. Appeal of Community Bank of Central WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Community State Bank v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.