Legal Opinion

Raymond Nitzel and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. The Austin Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1957No. 5598Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appeal is taken from a judgment of no cause of action entered upon the verdict of a jury in an action by plaintiffs against defendant for damages occasioned by personal injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff Nitzel as a result of defendant’s negligence. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the District Court for the District of Colorado. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, compensation insurer of plaintiff Nitzel’s employer, has paid to the individual plaintiff in excess of $10,000 in workmen’s compensation benefits and is joined as party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  2. Washington Ry. & Electric Co. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. NewcomerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. BrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Ferguson v. Ringsby Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API