Legal Opinion
Doe Ex Rel. Fein v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1997No. 96-SP-1242PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
We are presented here with a question of law certified to us under D.C.Code § 11-723 (1995) by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 1 The issue is whether the plaintiffs claims for negligence against the District of Columbia and two of its employees are barred because of her failure to give the requisite notice to the District under D.C.Code § 12-309 (1995). 2 The precise question that has been certified for review is:
Are Jane Doe’s claims for negligence, based on the District of Columbia Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Act of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Rieser v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Pitts v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- District of Columbia v. DunmoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Arnold & PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Enders v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Powers-Bunce v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Gross Ex Rel. Spears v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cornish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.