Mortensen v. Mortensen
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurrence
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
(concurring).
I concur in the majority opinion, at least as I understand its scope. I write separately to explain that understanding. As I read the majority opinion, the rules articulated today require only that in the usual case not fitting within one of the exceptions spelled out by Justice Howe, property acquired by one spouse during the marriage through gift or inheritance should be awarded to that spouse upon divorce. I take this to be nothing more than a variation on the analogous rule applicable to property brought into the marriage by one party: in the usual case,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Noble v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Preston v. PrestonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Race v. RaceUtah Supreme Court · 1987