Legal Opinion

Race v. Race

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1987No. 19146PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

The plaintiff, Susan Q. Race, appeals from a decree of divorce in which she and the defendant, Robert W. Race, were each awarded a divorce from the other. She contends that the trial court erred in its division of marital property and in its orders as to payment of debts, child support, and contempt of the plaintiff.

I. DEBTS

At the time of trial, the defendant was a debtor in a wage-earner plan (chapter 13) in the federal bankruptcy court. In its decree of divorce, the trial court ordered that a house and lot owned by the parties be sold, the debts listed on the defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruprecht v. RuprechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Closson v. ClossonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. First National Bank v. KirschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. State ex rel. City of Casper v. MorganWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Woodward v. WoodwardUtah Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Carter v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mortensen v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mortensen v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Race v. RaceUtah Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API