Legal Opinion

Bartz v. Wheat

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1982No. 14367PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neely, Justice:

This case presents the question of whether a defendant in an automobile accident case may use the family purpose doctrine to impute the contributory negligence of the driver of the plaintiffs vehicle to the plaintiff-owner to bar recovery for damages to the car by the plaintiff. We hold that, consistent with the purposes behind our family purpose doctrine, he may not.

On 1 August 1974 Rickey Joe Bartz was riding a motorcycle owned by his father, Martin Bartz, Sr., on Route 67 in Brooke County. Rickey was following a car driven by John Wheat when he noticed that the car was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. YupNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Divita v. Atlantic Trucking Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Watson v. BurleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Freeland Ex Rel. Dunigan v. FreelandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wenisch v. HoffmeisterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ward v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cole v. FairchildWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Madrid v. ShryockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Erie Indemnity Co. v. KernsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Williams v. Division of HighwaysWest Virginia Court of Claims · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API