Legal Opinion

Payne v. Chambliss

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1921No. 11802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Americus — Judge Harper. July 27, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The mere walking along a railroad track or railroad trestle is not in every case negligence per se, and, even if negligence per se, such negligence will not in every case bar a recovery for injuries received from an approaching train. Whether or not one is negligent, or to what degree he may be negligent, in crossing on a railroad trestle must be determined by the nature of the trestle, its length, height, etc., together with the character of its surroundings. Whether or not one negligently crossing upon a railroad trestle would be barred from recovery for injuries received from an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coney v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Williams v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Burton v. Wadley Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Ocilla Southern Railroad v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. Butler v. WintonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Taylor v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Georgia, Ashburn, Sylvester & Camilla Ry. Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API