Legal Opinion

Nish v. Town of Poestenkill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.

*930Plaintiff commenced this action against the State of New York and others in Supreme Court to recover money damages arising from the alleged appropriation of and trespass upon her property during the widening of Route 66, a State highway in Rensselaer County. As an affirmative defense in its answer, the State alleged that Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. The State subsequently moved to dismiss the complaint against it based on that lack of subject matter jurisdiction (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [2]). Plaintiff cross-moved for an order severing the causes of action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Dreger v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DeweyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Henion v. Comptroller of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Wynne v. DestasoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Liddy v. DeStasoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Comical Entertainment Corp. v. City UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API