Legal Opinion

Olson v. Richard

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2004No. 40259PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*241OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal presents an issue of first impression related to construction defects cases brought under Chapter 40 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Based on our decision in Calloway v. City of Reno,2 wherein this court held that a plaintiff may not allege a negligence claim for purely economic losses in a construction defects case, the district court dismissed appellants’ negligence claim. We conclude that the district court erred because, unlike at common law, a plaintiff can pursue a negligence claim when suing under NRS Chapter 40.

FACTS

In August 1994, James and Candace Olson (the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Standard Oil Company of California v. Clyde A. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Krause Inc. v. LittleNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Barrett v. BairdNevada Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by68 opinions

  1. Shuette v. Beazer Homes Holdings Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Association of Apartment Owners of Newtown Meadows Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Venture 15, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Jordan v. State Ex Rel. Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Charlier Clark & Linard, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API