Legal Opinion

Sours v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1985No. 13901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Presiding Judge.

Movant, then defendant, was, inter alia, jury-convicted of a felony count of receiving stolen property. He was court-sentenced to 15 years imprisonment on that count as a persistent offender. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Sours, 633 S.W.2d 255 (Mo.App.1982). Movant now appeals from a judgment entered after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 27.26 1 motion.

Movant’s lone point relied on is that the trial court’s “conclusion that an extended term as a persistent offender was properly imposed is clearly erroneous in that 1) the information…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. SoursMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. PulisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KoehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Black v. Cowan Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Sours v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. LoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API