Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Haines

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1930No. Docket No. 4013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages for the alienation of the affections of a wife. The judgment was entered upon the rendering of the verdict of a jury. A reversal is sought upon the sole ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

The plaintiff and Gladys Cheney were married at Jackson, California, December 10, 1922. They immediately moved to Marshfield, Oregon, where they established a home and for some time lived happily. A daughter, Betty, was born as the issue of the marriage in 1924. Mr. and Mrs. Cheney, the parents of Mrs. Rogers,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Horowitz v. SacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Mussellem v. FrennSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Smith v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berger v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Jefferson v. KenossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API