Legal Opinion

Leo v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1902No. 12,378PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Baker, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

A careful perusal of the record of the prosecution of the plaintiff in error (defendant below) leads to the conclusion that the judgment of conviction ought not to be permitted to stand, and this altogether without regard to the merits of the question of guilt or innocence of the accused. To affirm the judgment does violence to well-settled and recognized rules of practice and procedure in criminal prosecutions, and establishes a precedent that would be in violation of our conception of the rights of every individual charged with crime, and of safeguards thrown round him in a prosecution for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ChuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Rudolph v. LandwerlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Martin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Fanning v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Coyle v. StopakNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Garcia v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Laycock v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API