In re Federal Biscuit Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Petition to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United -States for the Southern District of New York. On November 9, 1911, one Edward C. Vick commenced an action in the Supreme Court.of the state of New York to recover from the Federal Biscuit •Company the sum of $5,300, the amount due him as commissions on the sale of stock of the biscuit company. In that action a writ of attachment was granted Vick against the property of the biscuit company.
Read the full summary
Petition to Revise an Order of the District Court of the United -States for the Southern District of New York. On November 9, 1911, one Edward C. Vick commenced an action in the Supreme Court.of the state of New York to recover from the Federal Biscuit •Company the sum of $5,300, the amount due him as commissions on the sale of stock of the biscuit company. In that action a writ of attachment was granted Vick against the property of the biscuit company. Thereafter an attempt was made to obtain the bonding of the attachment. Application was made to the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company…
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This court was called upon to pass upon this same motion in February, 1913. The court below had then entered an order in which it granted the relief asked, and we reversed its action in part. We then said:
“So much of the order, therefore, as grants a stay will be affirmed. We think this measure of relief all that is called for at the present time and sufficient to determine the rights of the parties. The other portions of the order are, however, set aside without prejudice to further proceedings if necessary.” In re Federal Biscuit Co., supra.
The motion was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christal v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- King v. Will J. Block Amusement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- King v. Will J. Block Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Pool v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- In re BusbyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fischer v. Pauline Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In the Matter of General Steel Tank Company, Inc., Bankrupt. Merritt-Holland Welding Suplies, Inc. v. General Steel Tank Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- MANUFACTURERS'FINANCE CORPORATION v. Vye-Neill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Higgins v. BrainardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Bankers Trust Co. v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.