Legal Opinion

Neppach v. Norval

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a suit to declare a resulting trust in certain lots situated in the City of Portland. Briefly stated, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff was married to Kate M. Neppach in the year 1888; that in 1908 he bought the property now in dispute, paying for it with his own money, with the understanding and agreement that the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Boyd v. M'LeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  4. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Dorman v. DormanIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HelzerOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Heitkemper v. SchmeerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Unterkircher v. UnterkircherOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Bowns v. BownsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Johnston v. McKeanOregon Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API