Brooks v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Appellant challenges his conviction, after a bench trial, for possession of heroin, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error when it denied his mid-trial request to withdraw his express waiver of the right to confront a government chemist. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm.
I. Statement of Facts
On August 12, 2008, appellant was approached by Officer David Wildey of the Metropolitan Police Department, who, after searching the right pocket of appellant’s cargo shorts, found two small zip-lock bags, each containing a tan powder substance. 1 After…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bishop v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Blocker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Davidson A/K/A Muhammad v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- Expedia, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Expedia, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.