Legal Opinion

Dahlin v. Frieborn

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 30, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02585Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By way of this action, Plaintiffs James and Kimberly Dahlin (the “Dahlins”), and 18 Toby and Martina Tippets (the “Tippets,” and collectively with the Dahlins, “Plaintiffs”) 19 assert 11 federal and state causes of action against various municipal and non- 20 municipal Defendants stemming from the seizure of various items and 57 dogs from the 21 Dahlins’ property, where…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API