Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer v. Guckenheimer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Polk county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

On March 29, 1892, the plaintiff in error interposed ■a claim to certain goods and chattels which had been taken bj^ the sheriff of Polk county under a writ of attachment against the goods, chattels, lands and tenements of Montfort & Co., a firm composed of W. T. Montfort and J. S. Oppenheimer, sued out by defendants in error. Upon the trial of this claim proceeding in the Circuit Court of Polk county the following facts were proven: J. S. Oppenheimer was claimant’s brother. On January 1, 1892, Montfort & Co. were insolvent, and the claimant was aware of that fact; Montfort & Co. were at that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Kelly & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Elser v. GraberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Seger's Sons v. Thomas Bros.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Geo. Seligson & Co. v. Brown & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Ballard v. Eckman & VetsburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Jackson v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Walling v. Christian & Craft Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1899
  4. M. Rosenheim & Son v. Flanders SistersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Sly v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API