Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1990No. 93PA89PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the Utilities Commission may pass on to the ratepayers the benefits of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA-86) through a rulemaking procedure rather than a ratemaking procedure. The Court of Appeals held “there is no authority either in our statutes or in the case law that allows rates to be adjusted by a rulemaking process.” Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power and Light Company, 92 N.C. App. 545, 553, 375 S.E.2d 515, 520 (1989). The Court of Appeals reversed the orders of the Utilities Commission as applied to Nantahala Power and Light Company…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tennessee Cable Television Ass'n v. Tennessee Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Virginia Elec.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Virginia Elec.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API