Legal Opinion
The Pemaquid
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 19, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HADE, District Judge.
This case is now before me upon a question of costs. After hearing in the District Court, in 1918, in the matter of collision between two vessels, I held the steamer Pemaquid to be in fault, and the Morse, the steamer owned by the libelant, to be free from fault. 255 Fed. 709. An appeal was taken. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the finding of the District Court, and held both vessels to be in fault. 288 Fed. 666.
It is now contended by the libelant that he should recover full costs in the-District Court. The record shows that no cross-libel was filed; the damages of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The " America."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Chisholm v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
- Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Warren Foundry & Machine Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
- The GladiatorDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1898
- Pennsylvania R. v. GoldenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ingraham v. J. S. Packard Dredging Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1931