Legal Opinion

Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 19, 2012No. MICV201004044APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Wilkins, Douglas H., J.

This case concerns a Level II registered sex offender’s right to an adjudicatory hearing when he moves for reclassification into a lower risk category based upon an alleged long-term decline in his dangerousness. See 803 Code Mass. Regs. §1.37C(2) (2004) (“Offender’s Motion for Reclassification”). In his amended complaint, the plaintiff (referred to herein by the pseudonym, “Doe”) seeks a declaration under G.L.c. 231A that the state and federal constitutions, read in conjunction with G.L.c. 30A, §1(1), prohibit the defendant, Sex Offender Registry Board (“SORB” or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Doe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API