Oetting v. Missouri Osteopathic Foundation
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BERREY, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Vivian Oetting, appeals from the trial court’s grants of summary judgment in favor of respondent Doerhoff Surgical Services, on the basis that the statute of limitations had run and in favor of respondent Still Hospital, on the basis that no genuine issues of material fact were presented. Affirmed.
Appellant presents two points for consideration: (1) that the trial court erred in granting Doerhoff’s motion for summary judgment because the statute of limitations may be tolled where there is an overt act concealing her cause of action; and (2) that *152the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fisher v. Scott & Fetzer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Commerce Bank of Kansas City, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tayborn v. BursteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Consumers Oil Co. v. American National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Maxi-Lift, Inc. v. CorbettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Smith v. BoyettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Hopmeier v. First American Title Insurance Co. of Mid-WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- McCrary v. Truman Medical Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Smith v. BoyettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995