Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boyett

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 11, 1995No. 94SC420PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari to clarify the elements of knowing concealment under the *510Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations1, and to determine whether the plaintiffs’ claim in this case should have survived imposition of summary judgment. We affirm the court of appeals, both in its holding that a plaintiff need not confront a doctor with discovered negligence and then be misled by that doctor in order to qualify for the knowing concealment exception to the statute of limitations; and in its determination that the plaintiffs have raised material issues of disputed fact that preclude imposition…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Williams v. BoyleColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. Winn v. Sunrise Hospital & Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Gunnier v. Yakima Heart Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API