Joseph Watson v. Patrick Pearson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
*509Joseph D. Watson filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that law-enforcement officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights by engaging in a warrantless search of the curtilage surrounding the residence where he was found. The district court agreed that the officers had violated Watson's Fourth Amendment rights, but held that those rights were not clearly established at the time of the officers' actions. Accordingly, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the officers based on the doctrine of qualified immunity. Watson then filed this timely…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James Williams v. Brian MaurerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Ruby Hicks v. Doris ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- The Keene Group, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Baillargeon v. HuberDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Barbara Haywood v. Lawrence HoughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.