Legal Opinion
Underhill v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 1930No. Docket No. 168Published
1Opinion of the Court
WARMER, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment against her in an action to recover damages caused by plaintiff’s colliding with the defendant’s automobile while she was crossing a public street in the city of Redlands, county of San Bernardino, California. The ease was tried without' a jury and the court found among other things:
“I.
“The court hereby finds that at the time and place referred to in plaintiff’s complaint, one W. E. Holmlund was driving and operating an automobile belonging to the defendant. The court further finds that it is not true that said W. E.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Arnold v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.