Stokes v. Thiemann
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
An action was filed in assumpsit and trespass, the plaintiff, appellee in this appeal, alleging that the defendants, appellants before us, owed him certain sums of money for services rendered. A jury trial ended on December 14,1979, with a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants then tried to settle the dispute by tendering an amount less than the jury verdict. This was refused by the plaintiff. The defendants did not file their post-trial motions until a month after the verdict. 1 Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 227.1 2 provides that post-verdict motions must be filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Gagliardi v. LynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Templeton AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Coppage v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Korn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Gutman v. RissingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Weir by Gasper v. CiaoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. JokiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.