Legal Opinion

Carter v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 19, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

815 A.2d 460 (2003)

175 N.J. 402

David CARTER and Donna Carter, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Alice F. REYNOLDS, Defendant,

Stevens, Fluhr, Chismar, Alvino & Schechter, C.P.A., Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 7, 2002.

Decided February 19, 2003.

Stephen R. Dumser argued the cause for appellant (Gercke, Dumser, Shoemaker & Sierzega, attorneys; Mr. Dumser and Ronald P. Sierzega, Cherry Hill, on the brief).

Alan H. Sklarsky, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for respondents (Tomar O'Brien Kaplan Jacoby & Graziano, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lundberg v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API