Carter v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
815 A.2d 460 (2003)
175 N.J. 402
David CARTER and Donna Carter, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Alice F. REYNOLDS, Defendant,
Stevens, Fluhr, Chismar, Alvino & Schechter, C.P.A., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 7, 2002.
Decided February 19, 2003.
Stephen R. Dumser argued the cause for appellant (Gercke, Dumser, Shoemaker & Sierzega, attorneys; Mr. Dumser and Ronald P. Sierzega, Cherry Hill, on the brief).
Alan H. Sklarsky, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for respondents (Tomar O'Brien Kaplan Jacoby & Graziano, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lundberg v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.