Legal Opinion

Wickens v. Valley State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 28,016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

We have here three actions consolidated, all for the purpose of holding the Valley State Bank responsible as participant in breaches of trust by its cashier?. C. B. Lambe. They involve separate stages of a series of transactions between Lambe and James Wickens, now deceased. The first case was brought by .the grandsons of Wickens to recover $17,934, alleged to have beeii dissipated through Lambe’s wrongful acts; the second, by the Union National Bank, the successor in trust, to recover the amount óf a trust fund established by the deceased…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Knobelock v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Elberta Peach & Land Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. United States Fidelity Co. v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Meinhart v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank IV Olathe v. Capitol Fed'l Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Hubbard v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  3. Bank IV Olathe v. Capitol Fed'l Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API