Legal Opinion

Jane Doe v. Dean Boland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2012No. 11-4237PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

To help defendants resist child-pornography charges, technology expert and lawyer Dean Boland downloaded images of children from a stock photography website and digitally imposed the children’s faces onto the bodies of adults performing sex acts. Boland’s aim was to show that the defendants may not have known they were viewing child pornography. When the parents of the children involved found out about the images, they sued Boland under the civil-remedy provisions of two federal child-pornography statutes. The district court granted summary judgment to the parents…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Jane Doe v. Alan HeskethCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Harry Calcutt III v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  3. Teresa Prewett v. Stanely WeemsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Theodore StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API