Tuttle v. Irvine Const. Co.'s Receiver

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Clay—

Affirming.

A. M. Clark, as receiver of the Irvine Construction Company, brought this suit against Joseph Tuttle and P. B. Neal to recover on a supersedeas bond. The facts pleaded are, in brief, as follows: Clark, as receiver of the. Irvine Construction Company, sued Homer Tuttle in the same court to "recover $1,000 for the rental of certain machinery. Trial was had, and he recovered a verdict and judgment for $884.12. Homer Tuttle was granted an appeal from the judgment, and on February 17, 1933, executed a bond with P. B. Neal and Joseph Tuttle as…