Legal Opinion

Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

742 A.2d 684 (1999)

Sid BURSTEIN and Doreen Burstein, Appellees,

v.

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued June 14, 1999.

Filed November 29, 1999.

Charles W. Craven, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Milton J. Frank, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before McEWEN, President Judge, and CAVANAUGH, KELLY, POPOVICH, JOHNSON, FORD ELLIOTT, STEVENS, SCHILLER and LALLY-GREEN, JJ.

SCHILLER, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, appeals from an order dated June 2, 1997, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. We…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API