Legal Opinion

Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Hemmings

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1941No. 13859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

The argument of plaintiff in error as to why this court should entertain jurisdiction of the writ of error is this : Certain full-bench decisions of this court, which are pointed out, laying down the principle of law that ordinarily it is a .question for the jury to determine whether or not it is negligence on the part of the engineer under the circumstances stated, are violative of certain provisions of the constitution of the United States; that under the act approved December 9, 1858 (Acts 1858, p. 74), it was enacted that decisions of this court in which all of the three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Thornton v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Lucas v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  4. Heard v. Russell & PotterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  5. Bond v. MunroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Wade v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. HemmingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API