Legal Opinion

State v. Tapio

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1988No. 16283, 16285, 16320 and 16323PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

In this consolidated intermediate appeal, we reverse the orders of the trial court which (1) reinstated a disqualified judge to preside over two criminal actions, (2) removed the state’s attorney and his staff from prosecuting the actions, and (3) required the attorney general to assume prosecution of the actions. We affirm that part of the trial court’s orders raised by notice of review, which denied defendants Robert Dean Tapio’s and Blaine John Brings Plenty’s (appellees’) motions to dismiss grounded on prosecutorial misconduct.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS

Appellees…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AshkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. RosalesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Lovell v. WeissOregon Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Brings PlentySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BlackburnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Estate of Paul O'farrell v. Grand Valley Hutterian BrethrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API