Legal Opinion
DiPiave v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 17, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00061Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VIENNA DiPIAVE, Plaintiff, No. 3:23-cv-61 (SRU) v. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP., et al., Defendants. RULING AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiff Vienna DiPiave claims that defendants Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation (collectively, “Sikorsky”) and Aquinas Consulting, LLC (“Aquinas”), collectively “Defendants,” discriminated against her in the terms and conditions of her employment and wrongfully discharged her due to her pregnancy. Sikorsky and Aquinas have separately moved to dismiss Counts Two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Melanie Geisler v. Orlando R. Petrocelli and Pinnacle Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.