Legal Opinion
Facundo-Guerrero v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 2008No. A119814PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
Labor Code 1 section 4604.5, subdivision (d) (section 4604.5(d)) was enacted in 2003 as Senate Bill No. 228 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2003, ch. 639, § 27) (Senate Bill 228), and provided that, unless approved by an injured employee’s employer, benefits for chiropractic treatments and physical therapy sessions were limited to no more than 24 visits per industrial injury, if the injury occurred after January 1, 2004. The statute was amended the following year as part of Senate Bill No. 899 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2004, ch. 34, § 25) (Senate Bill…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Thompson v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bautista v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Chorn v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Chorn v. Workers Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Roger v. CorVel Healthcare CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.