Walter W.B. v. Elizabeth P.B.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
For over five years after their divorce the parties have hotly contested every aspect of the division of their marital property. They could not agree on anything. Based on detailed findings of fact, the trial judge ultimately decreed a division of 60% to the husband and 40% to the wife.
The issues presented are mainly factual and involve challenges to the trial judge’s exercise of discretion. After a careful review of the record, we are satisfied that the evidence fully supports the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Similarly, there was no abuse of discretion or error of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Bruce E.M. v. Dorothea A.M.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Wife B v. Husband BSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wegman v. WegmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Thielenhaus v. ThielenhausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Bachtle v. BachtleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Ramon v. RamonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.