Legal Opinion

Barker v. A. I. Namm & Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment adjudicating the rights of the parties in and to a former courtyard situated at the southwesterly corner of Fulton street and Elm Place, Brooklyn. By order, the action was severed, so that the sole parties whose rights herein are adjudicated are the plaintiffs and the public, the latter in the person of the city defendant.

The crucial document in this case consists of a deed in partition, to which is annexed a map or diagram. That deed is dated the 13th day of July, 1836, and was made by and between Anna Prince, as party of the first part, Susan…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Zipp v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Zipp v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SilvermanNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API