Mohawk, Inc. v. Cohen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Chief Judge.
The defendants appeal from an adverse final judgment in the sum of $29,650, plus interest and costs. The plaintiffs, in their amended complaint, sought to recover real estate broker’s commission which they alleged was due and owing to them under a written contract entered into between the parties. The contract, which was referred to in the complaint and attached thereto as an exhibit, provided, inter alia:
“Regarding the commissions earned in connection with services rendered by the undersigned, as brokers, in the matter of negotiating a lease on your be^ half, * * *;
“You…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Murphy v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Walker and McClelland v. ChanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Batchelder v. PrestmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Langford v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cohen v. Mohawk, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962
- International Community Corp. v. Orange Entertainment Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Kaskisto v. North American Equitable Life Assurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Mohawk, Inc. v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Perlman v. MannenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976