Sessum v. Hemperley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentSimon, Justice
After carefully reviewing the views expressed in the majority opinion as well as the several authorities cited therein, I am convinced that the holding of the majority does violence to the applicable codal articles and our jurisprudence.
This is purely a suit brought under the provisions of LSA-C.C. Art. 823 to estab*455lish a boundary line. The validity of any written title isoin no way involved. Defendants rely upon LSA-C.C. Art. 852 in pleading the prescription of 30 years, the provisions of which article apply only in an action in boundary. Where title is claimed the codal article, supra, is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Sattler v. PellichinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Foscue v. MitchellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Emmer v. RectorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Picou v. CuroleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.