Legal Opinion

Minard v. Boss Hotels Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1949No. 47466PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hays, G. J.

Action for damages for a malicious prosecution. There was a directed verdict for the defendants, and plaintiff-appeals.' The sole question presented here is: “Is there sufficient evidence to submit to a jury the question of whether or not the appellees instigated or procured the criminal prosecution of the appellant?” This issue being primarily factual we must examine the facts in the light most favorable to appellant. Lawson v. Fordyce, 234 Iowa 632, 12 N.W.2d 301; Comfort v. Continental Casualty Co., 239 Iowa 1206, 34 N.W.2d 588.

On January 3,1946, appellant was arrested under a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Campbell v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. King v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  4. Comfort v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. Wilson v. ThurlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sergeant v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Lukecart v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Rasmussen Buick-GMC, Inc. v. RoachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API