Lukecart v. Swift & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Snell, J. —
This is a law action for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff seeks actual and punitive damages. At the close of all the evidence the trial court directed a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
Defendants in this action are Swift & Company, Leonard Rumpf, plant superintendent, and Gene Kelly, plant supervisor, of Swift’s fertilizer plant at Mason City.
Prior to May 4, 1962, plaintiff had been employed at the Swift & Company fertilizer plant in Mason City. He had been so employed since 1955. His work was entirely satisfactory. At first he wheeled fertilizer bags on a hand truck. He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Bair v. ShoultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Minard v. Boss Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949
3Cited by10 opinions
- Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Linda Linn and Mark Shuck v. Pat Montgomery, Christy Schrader, and Brad AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Vander Linden v. CrewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Winckel v. Von Maur, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Moser v. County of Black HawkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.