Legal Opinion

Lukecart v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1964No. 51398PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Snell, J. —

This is a law action for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff seeks actual and punitive damages. At the close of all the evidence the trial court directed a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

Defendants in this action are Swift & Company, Leonard Rumpf, plant superintendent, and Gene Kelly, plant supervisor, of Swift’s fertilizer plant at Mason City.

Prior to May 4, 1962, plaintiff had been employed at the Swift & Company fertilizer plant in Mason City. He had been so employed since 1955. His work was entirely satisfactory. At first he wheeled fertilizer bags on a hand truck. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Schnathorst v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Bair v. ShoultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Minard v. Boss Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
  2. Linda Linn and Mark Shuck v. Pat Montgomery, Christy Schrader, and Brad AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Vander Linden v. CrewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Winckel v. Von Maur, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Moser v. County of Black HawkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API