Legal Opinion

Element Financial Corp. v. Marcinkoski Gradall, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 2017No. 4D16-368Published

1Opinion of the CourtKuntz, J.

Element Financial Corp. appeals the trial court’s final judgment in favor of appellees, where the court found that Element did not have a perfected security interest. The court first concluded that a guarantor is a debtor pursuant to section 679.3161(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2014), and therefore, that Element was required to perfect its lien in Florida within four months of the guarantor moving to this state. Next, the court concluded that the appellees were buyers in the ordinary course of business and, pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code, section 679.320(1), Florida Statutes (2014),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Security Pacific National Bank v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Martin Brothers Implement Co. v. DiepholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Topical Jewelers, Inc. v. Nationsbank, NaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Burley v. Gelco Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Gennet v. FasonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API