Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 23, 2014No. 14-0029/ARPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge OHLSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted review in this ease to determine whether the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) erred in finding that the military judge’s failure to instruct on the special defense of defense of property was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We hold that the military judge’s error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, and thus affirm the CCA.

FACTS

In February 2010, Specialist (SPC) S.S., his girlfriend (A.R.), Appellant, and Appellant’s wife (Mrs. Davis) went to a sports bar together. SPC S.S. and A.R. had arranged with Mrs. Davis…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WolfordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. DearingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. RegaladoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. DobsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  2. United States v. Specialist JOSHUA D. CHANDLERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  3. United States v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  4. United States v. JeterNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  5. United States v. Private E1 ANTHONY v. SANTUCCIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API