Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Holiness Band v. Spires

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1899No. L.A. No. 502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders refusing a new trial and to strike out portions of a cost bill. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

—This is an action to quiet title. The court below found the following facts: Prior to April, 1881, an association of persons were in the habit of meeting together for religious services in the city and county of Los Angeles, calling themselves the Los Angeles Holiness Band, and in April, 1881, six of the members of said Holiness Band signed and acknowledged articles of incorporation under the name of the Los Angeles Holiness Band, incorporating for religious and benevolent purposes. And in such articles of incorporation the six members who thus signed and acknowledged the same were chosen…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. First Presbyterian Church of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. La RueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Lakeside Ditch Co. v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Baker v. DuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bakersfield Town Hall Ass'n v. ChesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Supreme Lodge of the World v. Los Angeles Lodge No. 386California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Westwood Temple v. Emanuel CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. McCann v. Children's Home SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API