Legal Opinion

Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 2001No. 98-06193 and 98-03468; A111407PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

This workers’ compensation case requires us to determine whether Barrett Business Services, Inc. (Barrett), having accepted responsibility for claimant’s compensable injury, was entitled subsequently to issue a “back-up” denial based on evidence obtained after claim acceptance, indicating that an earlier employer, Freightliner LLC (Freightliner), was responsible. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) rejected Barrett’s argument, concluding that the denial was not based on ‘later obtained evidence.” We review the Board’s understanding of what ‘later obtained evidence” means for errors of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. CNA Insurance Companies v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Freightliner Corp. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Greenbriar Ag Management v. LemusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Curry Educational Service District v. BengtsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Speciality Risk Services v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Ternes v. GALICHIACourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. SAIF Corp. v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API